科目名: 国際農業分析2／International Political Economy of Food and Agriculture (Alt. Monday 13:30-17:00)

• Theme: International Political Economy Approach to Food Security Governance
• Course Outline and Objectives: This course is a seminar about international political economy of agriculture, with a series of topics on global food governance focused on existing and probable economic, legal and political tools to hold TNCs accountable for their negative impacts on society, human rights and the environment. For this semester, we are going to read together a book of "food security governance" to learn how relevant concepts of food security, food sovereignty, and the right to food are developed and in what way they are applied in the global as well as local-level political struggles over food governance, and to construct solutions to world food crises and agrarian and development problems.
  This course is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance, as well as transnational corporations in developing countries, from a wide range of social scientific perspectives: including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English. Although the name of this course suggests that it is the continuation of the Spring semester's course "International Political Economy of Agriculture 1", actually it is other way around since many of expected participants are students of the International Graduate Programme for East Asia Sustainable Economic Development Studies, which academic year starts in October.
  

• Course Schedule and Content: In this course, students will review the following literature.
  • McKeon N. (2015) Food Security Governance: Empowering Communities, Regulating Corporations. Routledge.
    • Introduction
      
    • 1. Food governance: a rapid historical review
      
    • 2. Food provision in a globalized world
      
    • 3. What’s in a paradigm? Food security, food sovereignty and evidence-based decision-making
      
    • 4. Reactions to the food price crisis and the challenge of rethinking global food governance
      
    • 5. Local-global: building food governance from the bottom up
      
    • 6. Building a better food system from the top reaching downward
      
    • 7. Where to now?
      

• Course Requirement: In the past semesters in 2011 and 2012, the students reviewed several books on the politics of food and food sovereignty to understand how relevant concepts of food security, food sovereignty, and the right to food are developed and in what way they are applied in the political struggle over food governance, and to construct solutions to world food crises and agrarian and development problems. Therefore, especially new students who are not familiar with these concepts are strongly recommended to read through the following books in preparation for the course so as to actively contribute to the discussions during the semester.
  
  • Eric Holt-Gimenez ed., Food Movements Unite! Food First Books, 2011
  • Jean Ziegler et al. The Fight for the Right to Food: Lessons Learned, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, Chap 1&2
    

• Grading & Evaluation: Grading will be done on the basis of attendance, class participation, and occasional assigned presentations by each student. We use mainly English during the classes and therefore students are encouraged to use English for the assigned presentations, at least for the written summary of assigned part of the textbook even when students are incapable of giving a presentation in English.
  

科目名: 国際農業分析1／International Agribusness Studies (Alt.Monday 13:30-17:00)

• Theme: Global Governance of Agriculture and the Interaction between CSO/NGOs and Agribusinesses
• Course Outline and Objectives: Following up with what we learnt and discussed during the previous semesters, which focused on the general framework of global governance of food from a human-rights perspective, and existing and probable economic, legal and political tools (including CSR initiatives and social and environmental standards and certification schemes) to hold TNCs accountable for their negative impacts on society and the environment, we are going to delve into the role of non-governmental organisations and civil society movements in light of an on-going trend of privatisation of global governance. This course is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance, as well as transnational corporations in developing countries, from a wide range of social scientific perspectives: including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English.
  
• Course Schedule and Content: In this course, students will review the following literature on the role of NGOs and civil society movements in light of an on-going trend of privatisation of global governance, so that students can debate and understand how the idea of making transnational corporations accountable and responsible for the right to food (and other economic, social and cultural human rights) has developed and in what way it can be implemented and enforced on the ground.
  
  • David Lewis & Nazneen Kanji, Non-Governmental Organizations and Development, Routledge, 2009
    
  • Michael Yaziji & Jonathan Doh, NGOs and Corporations: Conflict and Collaboration, Cambridge UP, 2009
    
  • Nora McKeon, The United Nations and Civil Society: Legitimating Global Governance – Whose Voice? Zed Books, 2009
    

科目名: 国際農業分析2／International Political Economy of Food and Agriculture (Alt. Monday 13:30-17:00)

• Theme: Multidisciplinary and Multidimensional Approach to Agri-food Governance Studies
• Course Outline and Objectives: The last twenty years have seen a burgeoning of social scientific and historical research on food. Given a broad range of topics and aspects of food-related issues, the main objective of the course in this semester is to develop and attain a critical overview of the issues from multi-disciplinary and multi-dimensional perspectives, or through the lens of social, economic, political, geographical, psychological, cultural, nutritional and ecological studies. For this purpose, we are going to read a review handbook of international food research together and have in-depth interactive discussion. This course is a seminar about international political economy of agriculture, with a series of topics on global food governance focused on existing and probable economic, legal and political tools to hold TNCs accountable for their negative impacts on society, human rights and the environment. It is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance, as well as transnational corporations in developing countries, from a wide range of social scientific perspectives: including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English.
  

• Course Schedule and Content: The contents of the textbook (Anne Murcott, Warren Belasco, Peter Jackson (eds) The Handbook of Food Research, Bloomsbury Academic, 2013) are as follows:
  
  • Part One: Historical Essentials
    
  • Part Two: Frameworks of Provision: Production and Distribution
    
  • Part Three: Buying and Eating
    
  • Part Four: Contemporary Issues, Problems and Policy
    

科目名: 国際農業分析1／International Agribusness Studies (Monday 13:30-17:00)

• Theme: Global Governance of Agriculture and CSR Initiatives of Agribusinesses
• Course Outline and Objectives: According to the current U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier De Schutter, there are various tools and mechanisms through which the human rights accountability of transnational corporations (TNCs) might be improved: (i) the responsibility of States in controlling TNCs; (ii) self-regulation by TNCs such as the use of codes of conduct and/or third-party regulation by independent certifiers such as socially and environmentally sustainable standard and labelling schemes; (iii) the use of incentive measures such as public procurement policies and conditionalities in multilateral lending policies; and (iv) direct imposition on TNCs of obligations under international law. What should not be ignored in this context is the role of civil society movements to put massive pressures from the bottom to the above and challenge the hegemonic regime controlled by TNCs. However, the power of business as a political actor is overwhelming the nation-states’ as well as inter-governmental organisations’ capacity to mediate between the market and society and to regulate TNC behaviour. The question to be tackled here is how and in what way these multi-layered and multi-actor governance tools and mechanisms are being developed and implemented to regulate TNCs and make them responsible for economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to food. Following up with what we learnt and discussed during the previous semester, which focused on the general framework of global governance of food from a human-rights perspective, we are going to delve into existing and probable economic, legal and political tools (including CSR initiatives) to hold TNCs accountable for their massive negative impacts on wherever they are operating. This course is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance, as well as transnational corporations in developing countries, from a wide range of social scientific perspectives: including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English.
  
• Course Schedule and Content: In this course, students will review the following literature on the global food governance and the human rights accountability of transnational corporations, so that students can debate and understand how the idea of making transnational corporations accountable and responsible for the right to food (and other economic, social and cultural human rights) has developed and in what way it can be implemented and enforced on the ground.
  
  • Surya Deva, Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business, Routledge, 2012
  • Olufemi Amao, Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and the Law: Multinational Corporations in Developing Countries, Routledge, 2011
  • Aurora Voiculescu and Helen Yanacopulos eds., The Business of Human Rights: An Evolving Agenda for Corporate Responsibility, Zed Books, 2011
    

科目名: 国際農業分析2／International Political Economy of Food and Agriculture (Monday 13:30-17:00)

• Theme: Global Governance of Agriculture and Possibilities/Limitations of Private Standards
• Course Outline and Objectives: As a governance tool to address social and environmental externalities associated with the globalisation of commodity-value chains, we have observed the proliferation of market regulatory initiatives, such as labour, social and environmental standards (including certification and labelling schemes) for the management of natural resources during the past decade or so. These initiatives are usually described as “private standards” since they are designed, introduced and implemented largely by corporate actors on a voluntary basis (i.e. legally non-binding). One of the justifications is a shared understanding that existing multilateral and governmentally driven initiatives are incapable of addressing the global challenges. However, it is arguable whether private standards are effective and legitimate enough to address the unsustainable conditions of natural resources, food, labour and local communities. This course is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance, as well as transnational corporations in developing countries, from a wide range of social scientific perspectives: including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English.
  

• Course Schedule and Content: In this course, students will review the following literature on the effectiveness and legitimacy of private standards (voluntary certification and labelling schemes) as a global commodity governance and corporate regulatory tool, so that students can debate and understand in what way the idea of making transnational corporations accountable and responsible for the economic, social and cultural human rights (including the right to food) can be implemented and enforced on the ground.
  
  • International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food (2013)
    • Vol.20, Issue 1: Private Agri-food Standards 1: Contestation, Hybridity and the Politics of Standards
    • Vol.20, Issue 2: Private Agri-food Standards 2: Supply Chains and the Governance of Standards
  • Axel Marx, Miet Maertens, Johan Swinnen and Jan Wouters eds., Private Standards and Global Governance: Economic, Legal and Political Perspectives, Edward Elgar, 2012
  • Lawrence Busch, Standards: Recipes for Reality, MIT Press, 2011
  In the following semester (Spring 2014), our focus will be shifted to the role of civil society organisations and social movement vis-à-vis legal and institutional framework to regulate transnational corporations.
  

科目名: 国際農業分析2／International Political Economy of Food and Agriculture 2 （Monday 13:30-17:00）

• Theme: Global Governance of Agriculture and the RIght to Food for All
• Course Outline and Objectives: According to the current U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier De Schutter, there are various tools and mechanisms through which the human rights accountability of transnational corporations (TNCs) might be improved: (i) the responsibility of States in controlling TNCs; (ii) self-regulation by TNCs such as the use of codes of conduct and/or third-party regulation by independent certifiers such as socially and environmentally sustainable standard and labelling schemes; (iii) the use of incentive measures such as public procurement policies and conditionalities in multilateral lending policies; and (iv) direct imposition on TNCs of obligations under international law. What should not be ignored in this context is the role of NGO/CSOs and grass root movements (e.g. peasant movement, indigenous movement, landless movement) to put massive pressures from the bottom to the above and challenge the hegemonic regime controlled by TNCs. However, the power of business as a political actor is overwhelming the nation-states’ as well as inter-governmental organisations’ capacity to mediate between the market and society and to regulate TNC behaviour. The question to be tackled here is how and in what way these multi-layered and multi-actor governance tools and mechanisms are being developed and implemented to regulate TNCs and make them responsible for economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to food. This course is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance, as well as transnational corporations in developing countries, from a wide range of social scientific perspectives: including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English.
  
• Course Schedule and Content: In this course, students will review the following literature on the global food governance and the human rights accountability of transnational corporations, so that students can debate and understand how the idea of making transnational corporations accountable and responsible for the right to food (and other economic, social and cultural human rights) has developed and in what way it can be implemented and enforced on the ground.
  
  • 10/15: Introduction / Guidance
  • 10/29: Ziegler et al. (2011) Chapter 1, 2 & 3
  • 11/12: Ziegler et al. (2011) Chapter 4 & 17
  • 11/26: De Schutter & Cordes (2011) Chapter 1 & 2
  • 12/10: De Schutter & Cordes (2011) Chapter 3 & 4
  • 01/15: De Schutter & Cordes (2011) Chapter 5 & 7
  • Jean Ziegler et al. (2011) The Fight for the Right to Food: Lessons Learned, Palgrave Macmillan
  • Olivier De Schutter and Kaitlin Y Cordes eds. (2011) Accounting for Hunger: The Right to Food in the Era of Globalisation, Hart Publishing

• Guest Lecture Series:
  • 11/12: Prof. dr. Katarzyna Cwiertka (Modern Japan Studies, Faculty of Humanities/Institute of Area Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands)
  • 12/17: Dr. Keiko Tanaka (Rural Sociology, Department of Community and Leadership Development, University of Kentucky, USA)
  • 01/28: Ms. Khanam Virjee (Associate Editor, Environment and Sustainability | Development studies, Routledge/Earthscan, UK)

科目名: 国際農業分析1／International Political Economy of Food and Agriculture 1 （月3~4限）

• テーマ: 農業･食料のグローバル･ガバナンスと食料主権
• 受講に必要な予備知識: 社会経済学 (political economy) の基礎理論、農業問題に関する基礎知識が不可欠である。
• 評価の方法: 各自が分担する報告の内容と日常の討論参加態度によって評価する。
• 授業計画
  • 近年、WTO自由貿易レジームが行き詰まるも、TPP（環太平洋戦略的経済連携）協定をはじめとするFTA・EPAを通じた自由貿易路線への執着が露わとなっている。しかし、2007/08年に世界を震撼させた「世界食料危機」に引き続いて、早くも2010/11年には食料価格高騰が再来している。このような状況下、国際社会はあくまでも「飢餓と飽食」を誘発してきた自由貿易レジームの再編・強化の道を進むのか、それとも国連「食料への権利」論に象徴される国際人権レジームの構築を見据えた農業・食料の民主的ガバナンスへの転換を目指していくのかが問われている。本講義では、後者の道を展望するグローバル市民社会運動上の概念である「食料主権」論の可能性と課題について、政治経済学、国際法、農業経済学、農業社会学、市民社会論等の諸領域における研究成果を踏まえながら検討する。
  • 村田武編『食料主権のグランドデザイン』農文協、2011年
    • 1. 溶解するWTO体制と台頭するオルタナティブ 4/25
    • 2. WTO体制下の世界農業と農産物貿易 4/25
    • 3. 世界の穀物需給動向と遺伝子組換え作物の新展開 4/25
    • 4. カナダのマーケティング・ボードと供給管理政策 5/23
    • 5. 食料危機と「ビア・カンペシーナ」5/9
    • 6. 国連「食料への権利」論と国際人権レジームの可能性 5/9
    • 7. 日本農業と消費協同組合運動 5/23
    • 8. 食料主権のグランドデザインと期待される農政 5/23
  • 山田高敬／大矢根聡『グローバル社会の国際関係論 [新版]』有斐閣、2011年
    • 0. 世界を分析する四つの見方 6/6
    • 1. リアリズム 6/6
    • 2. リベラリズム 6/6
    • 3. 安全保障 6/20
    • 4. 国際経済関係 6/20
    • 5. 地球環境 7/4
    • 6. 人権 7/4
    • 7. 世界のゆくえと理論的な見方 7/4
      
  • 『農業と経済』2011年5月臨増「急浮上するTPPで日本農業はどうなる？」--- 政策論基礎で
    • 1. TPPの背景と予想される影響
    • 2. TPPの各分野への影響
    • 3. 自由貿易協定をめぐる教訓と展望
    • 4. 日本農業・農村の行く末を考える

Course Title: 国際農業分析2／International Political Economy of Food and Agriculture 2 （Monday 3-4）

• Theme: Global Governance of Agriculture and Food Sovereignty (農業グローバル･ガバナンスと食料主権)
• Course Requirements: Basic knowledge of political economy and agrarian issues are required. In the Spring semester of 2011, the course of International Political Economy of Agriculture 1 for the general course is planned to provide students with background information of global food governance and its implications for Japanese agriculture and food sector, mainly based on the literature of the controversial project of TPP agreement. Students are therefore encouraged to participate in that course (if possible), though the primary language of instruction and discussions will be Japanese.
• Grading & Evaluation: Grading will be done on the basis of attendance, class participation, and occasional assigned presentations by each student. We use mainly English during the classes and therefore students are encouraged to use English for the assigned presentations, at least for the written summary of assigned part of the textbook even when students are incapable of giving a presentation in English.
• Course Schedule and Content:
  • This course will provide students with an overview of the ongoing debate on the global governance of agriculture and food, especially in light of the 2007/2008 as well as the 2010/2011 world food crises. We are now confronted with a question of which way we should follow: the path of WTO free trade regime based on the neoliberal ideology, including the proposed TPPA negotiation; or the path of democratic governance aimed to develop the international human rights regime, including the concept of food sovereignty and the right to food for all as discussed in the United Nations. This course is designed for any and all students with an interest in the globally pressing issues of agriculture and food governance from a wide range of social scientific perspectives, including international political economy, international relations, international law, agricultural economics, rural sociology, development studies, civil society studies, and so on. The primary language of instruction and discussions will be English, although Japanese will also be used during the class. In this course, students will review the following literature on the politics of food and food sovereignty, so that students can debate and understand how relevant concepts of food security, food sovereignty, and the right to food are developed and in what way they are applied in the political struggle over food governance, and then students can construct solutions to world food crises and agrarian and development problems.
  • H. Wittman, A. A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe eds., Food Sovereignty: Reconnecting Food, Nature and Community, Fernwood Publishing, 2010
    • 1. The Origins & Potential of Food Sovereignty 10/17
    • 2. Framing Resistance: International Food Regimes & the Roots of Food Sovereignty 10/17
    • 3. Seeing Like a Peasant: Voices from La Via Campesina 10/31
    • 5. Capitalist Agriculture, the Food Price Crisis & Peasant Resistance 10/31
    • 7. Reconnecting Agriculture & the Environment: Food Sovereignty & Agrarian Basis of Ecological Citizenship 11/14
    • 12. Food Sovereignty in Movement: Addressing the Triple Crisis 11/14
  • S. M. Borras Jr, M. Edelman, and C. Kay eds., Transnational Agrarian Movement: Confronting Globalization, Wiley-Blackwell, 2008
    • 1. Transnational Agrarian Movements: Origins and Politics, Campaigns and Impact 11/28
  • W. D. Schanbacher, The Politics of Food: The Global Conflict between Food Security and Food Sovereignty, Praeger, 2010
    • 0. Introduction 12/12
    • 1. Globalization, Development, Food Security, and the Emergence of a Global Food Regime 12/12
    • 2. The Underside of Development 12/26
    • 3. Food Sovereignty as an Alternative 12/26
    • 4. Human Rights, Human Responsibilities, and the Capabilities Approach 1/23
    • 5. Ethical Analysis of Food Sovereignty and the Ethics of Globalization 1/23

前期テーマ: 農業問題研究の古典を読む

• 授業計画: 欧米農業社会学では、農業に特有な資本主義化の形態と道筋を「カウツキーの再発見」を通じて明らかにしてきた。すなわち、カウツキーは「農業は如何にして資本主義的となり、如何なる意味で資本主義化されるか、農業の特殊性は資本主義の中に如何なる姿をもって現れるか、それらは、相互に如何なる関係におかれるか、さらに資本家および工業プロレタリアートと如何なる関係に立つか、というような最も根本的な問題について深い行き渡った考察の結果を示している」(カウツキー『農業問題』岩波書店、訳者序文)。こうした「資本による農業の包摂subsumption」という視点が、彼らの問題意識の根底、農業問題研究の出発点にある。本授業では、原典＝カウツキー『農業問題』に立ち返りながら、「資本主義社会における農業の発展」について考察を深めたい。
  
  • カール･カウツキー（向坂逸郎訳）『農業問題』上/下、岩波書店、1985年 (旧版でも構わない)
  • Karl Kautsky, The Agrarian Question, translated by Pete Burgess, Zwan Publications, 1988 (2 volumes)
  • A. Haroon Akram-Lodhi and Cristóbal Kay,'The agrarian question: peasants and rural change', in: Peasants and Globalization: Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question, Routledge, pp.3-34, 2009.

後期当初テーマ: グローバル資本主義下における小農の主体性と対抗力を考える

• 授業計画: 資本主義下における家族農業＝小農の存続をどのように理解すべきかをめぐって、政治経済学や農業社会学の研究者は様々な議論を繰り広げてきた。古典的な農民層分解論が教えるところとは異なり、農業生産の領域に資本が浸透する仕方は、農場経営 (労働と土地) の直接的な支配権を掌握しなくても、例えば外部投入資材や信用貸付への依存、川上や川下の農業関連企業による垂直的調整や契約農業の進展など、間接的にも多様な形で行われていることは、アグリビジネス論的研究によって縷々明らかにされてきた。しかし、それでも存続する家族農業経営の将来展望をめぐっては、あくまでも「資本による農業の包摂」が拡大深化すると捉える構造主義的で法則論的な立場と、家族農業経営の能動性に着目し、むしろ「資本による農業の包摂」に柔軟に適応し、自らの領域を戦術的に確保しながら多様な事業展開を遂げうる行為主体と捉える機能主義的で状況依存論的な立場との乖離が見られる。本授業ではこれまで、本年度前期に取り上げるカウツキー「農業問題」再訪を含め、前者の政治経済学的な立場から「資本による農業の包摂」把握に努めてきたが、本年度後期は後者の立場を代表する欧州農村社会学ワーヘニンゲン学派の代表的な文献を取り上げながら、家族農業経営ないし小農の主体性と能動性、多国籍アグリビジネスに主導される農業の工業化とグローバル化に対する適応力と対抗力の如何を検討する。
  
  • Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization, Earthscan, 2008
  • ルース･ガッソン＆アンドリュー･エリングトン (玉真之介ほか監訳)『ファーム･ファミリー･ビジネス』筑波書房、2000年 (R. Gasson & A. Errington, The Farm Family Business, CAB International, 1993)

後期テーマ: グローバル資本主義とフードポリティクス

• 使用したテキスト
  • 『農業と経済』2010.4臨増「食は誰のものか？――錯綜する世界のフードポリティクス」
  • A.Bonanno & D.Constance, Stories of Globalization: Transnational Corporations, Resistance, and the State, Penn State U Press, 2008
  • 『農業と経済』2010.8臨増「進化する農村ツーリズム――協働する都市と農村」

• テーマ: グローバル資本主義下の国家と市民社会を把握するための諸理論
• 授業計画: 農業･食料を取り巻く諸問題と政策展開は、これまで国民国家（国家政策、国家間関係）の枠内で議論されることが多かった。しかし、農業･食料の生産･流通･消費の構造は国境を越えて広がり、そこに関与するアクター（利害関係主体）も、各国政府機関から国連機関やブレトンウッズ機関、WTO等の国際機関へ、農民団体から広範かつグローバルな市民社会組織へ、国内企業･産業団体から多国籍企業および国際的産業団体やシンクタンクへと拡大しており、これらのアクターが物質的･非物質的な影響力の行使を通じて利害を調整する過程をリアルかつ批判的に捉える分析枠組みが、いまや不可欠となっている。そこで本授業では、前後期を通じて国家論および市民社会論に関する文献を複数とりあげながら、グローバル化時代の国家と市場と市民社会を捉える視点について議論し、認識を深めていきたい。なお、昨年度のテーマである「農業社会学･農業政治経済学の国際的潮流と分析概念･理論枠組み」についても、引き続き国際農業分析ワークショップでとりあげる予定である。不定期開催なので、参加希望者は事前に確認すること。
  
• テキスト:
  • 伊藤述史『市民社会とグローバリゼーション』御茶の水書房、2006年 (4~5月)
  • ヨアヒム・ヒルシュ『国家･グローバル化･帝国主義』ミネルヴァ書房、2007年 (6~7月)
  • 中谷義和篇『グローバル化理論の視座』法律文化社、2007年
  • 吉田傑俊『市民社会論：その理論と歴史』大月書店、2005年 (10~11月)
  • 山口定『市民社会論：歴史的遺産と新展開』有斐閣、2004年 (12~2月)
• 参考文献:
  • 清水耕介『市民派のための国際政治経済学』社会評論社、2002年
  • 農業問題研究学会編『グローバル資本主義と農業』筑波書房、2008年

• テーマ: 農業社会学・農業政治経済学の国際的潮流と分析概念・理論枠組み
• 授業計画: 農業の工業化、フードレジーム、商品連鎖分析、農業・食料システムのグローバル化と再ローカル化、アクターネットワーク理論、コンヴァンシオン理論など、現代資本主義の農業・食料・農村問題について豊富な分析概念を提示してきた、農業社会学（ruralsociology, sociology of agriculture）や農業政治経済学（agrarian political economy）の国際的な潮流に関する基本的な論文・文献をサーヴェイする。必要に応じて、国際農業分析ワークショップと組み合わせる。
  
• 取り上げた文献:
  • William H. Friedland. 1991. "Introduction: Shaping the New Political Economy of Advanced Capitalist Agriculture". In: W.H.Friedland, L.Busch, F.H.Buttel, and A.P.Rudy, eds., Towards a New Political Economy of Agriculture. Westview Press. (4/28)
  • Frederick H. Buttel. 1996. "Theoretical Issues in Global Agri-Food Restructuring". In: D. Burch, R. E. Rickson & G. Lawrence, eds., Globalization and Agri-Food Restructuring: Perspectives from the Australasia Region. Ashgage. (4/28)
  • Frederick H. Buttel. 2001. "Some Reflections on Late Twentieth Century Agrarian Political Economy". Sociologia Ruralis 41(2): 165-181. (4/28)
  • Alessandro Bonanno, Lawrence Busch, William Friedland, Lourdes Gouveia & Enzo Mingione. 1994. "Introduction". In: From Columbus to ConAgra: The Globalization of Agriculture and Food. University Press of Kansas. (5/12)
  • Philip McMichael. 1994. "Introduction: Agro-Food System Restructuring – Unity in Diversity", In: P. McMichael, ed. The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems. Cornell University Press. (5/12)
  • William H. Friedland. 1984. "Commodity Systems Analysis: An Approach to the Sociology of Agriculture". Research in Rural Sociology and Development 1: 221-235. (5/26)
  • William H. Friedland. 2001. "Reprise on Commodity Systems Methodology". International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 9(1): 82-103.　(5/26)
  • Philip McMichael. 2005. "Global Development and the Corporate Food Regime". In: F. H. Buttel and P. McMichael, eds. New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development. Elsevier., pp.265-299.　(6/9)
  • Alessandro Bonanno and Douglas Constance. 1996. "2. The Debate on the Transition from Fordism to Global Post-Fordism /3. Global Post-Fordism and Transformations of the State". In: Caught in the Net: The Global Tuna Industry, Environmentalism, and the State. University Press of Kansas.　(6/21)
  • Wynne Wright and Gerad Middendorf. 2008. "Introduction". In: W. Wright and G. Middendorf, eds. The Fight Over Food: Producers, Consumers, and Activists Challenge the Global Food System. Penn State University Press.　(7/26)
  • Alessandro Bonanno and Douglas H. Constance. 2008. "Agency and Resistance in the Sociology of Agriculture and Food". Ibid. (7/26)
  • William H. Friedland. 2008. "Agency and the Agrifood System". Ibid. (7/26)
  • Norman Long. 2008. "Resistance, Agency, and Counterwork: A Theoretical Positioning". Ibid. (7/26)
  • David Goodman & Michael Watts. 1994. "Reconfiguring the Rural or Fording the Divide? Capitalist Restructuring and the Global Agro-Food System". Journal of Peasant Studies 22(1): 1-49. (10/20)
  • Alberto Arce & Terry Marsden. 1993. "Social Construction of International Food: A New Research Agenda". Economic Geography 69(3): 293-311. (11/10)
  • Frederick H. Buttel & Philip McMichael. 1994. "Reconsidering the Explanandum and Scope of Development Studies: Toward a Comparative Sociology of State-Economy Relations". In: David Booth, ed., Rethinking Social Development: Theory, Research and Practice. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical. (11/24)
  • Norman Long & Jan Douwe van der Ploeg. 1994. "Heterogeneity, Actor and Structure: Towards a Reconstitution of the Concept of Structure". In: David Booth, op.cit. (11/24)
  • Lawrence Busch & Arunas Juska. 1997. "Beyond Political Economy: Actor Networks and the Globalization of Agriculture". Review of International Political Economy 4(4): 688-708. (12/8)
  • John Wilkinson. 2006. "Network Theories and Political Economy: From Attrition to Convergence?" In: T. Marsden & J. Murdoch, eds.,Between the Local and the Global: Confronting Complexity in the Contemporary Agri-Food Sector, Amsterdam: Elsevier. (1/12)
  • Norman Long. 2001. "Introduction", "1. The case for an actor-oriented sociology of development", "5. Commoditisation and issues of social value", "10. Globalisation and localization". In: Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London: Routledge. (1/26, 2/10)
• 来年度の国際農業分析ワークショップで取り上げる予定の文献:
  • Jan Douwe van der Ploeg. 2008. "Setting the Scene", "What, then, is the Peasantry?" In: The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London, UK: Earthscan.
  • Terry Marsden. 1998. "New Rural Territories: Regulating the Differentiated Rural Spaces". Journal of Rural Studies 14(1): 107-117.
  • Terry Marsden & Alberto Arce. 1995. "Constructing Quality: Emerging Food Networks in the Rural Transition". Environment and Planning A 27(8): 1261-1279.
  • Jonathan Murdoch. 2000. "Networks: A New Paradigm of Rural Development". Journal of Rural Studies 16(4): 407-419.
  • Jonathan Murdoch, Terry Marsden & Jo Banks. 2000. "Quality, Nature, and Embeddedness: Some Theoretical Considerations in the Context of the Food Sector". Economic Geography 76(2): 107-125.
  • Henk Renting, Terry Marsden & Jo Banks. 2003. "Understanding Alternative Food Networks: Exploring the Role of Short Food Supply Chains in Rural Development". Environment and Planning A 35: 393-411.